Thursday, July 23, 2009

Eugene T. Gendlin

Eugene T. Gendlin

3 comments:

  1. Thank you for developing experiential techniques such as focusing, as a way to enhance client experiencing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It has been along time since those Univ. of Chicago days. Great to witness an old student excell! Your conclusion that a person's experience is always changing and never fixed is so true. What a simple concept adding an "ing". Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Dr Rogers,

    My name is William Adams and I am a senior at Boise State University. I am taking an argument class and my textbook offered a form of argumentation called "Invitational Argument." I did a little research and learned that the Authors whom they credited for the idea actually proffered an "Invitational Rhetoric." You were mentioned briefly in the article and I think that they rely heavily on your theory of psychotherapy. Anyway, I am trying to write an argument, in the spirit of Invitational Rhetoric, offering a perspective that sees this as misplaced in an argument class, and could have semantic consequences for the word argument itself. In short I thing that, while their ideas are good, and everyone should aspire to practice such rhetoric, it should remain being taught as rhetoric and not argument because they are diametric.

    ReplyDelete